Which guideline is NOT recommended for detecting and preventing insider threats in human resources?

In the context of detecting and preventing insider threats within human resources, one guideline that is not recommended is the notion of conducting background checks while simultaneously trusting employees. The principle of conducting background checks on individuals in sensitive positions is a proactive measure aimed at identifying potential risks before they become a threat. However, the idea of automatically trusting employees contradicts the necessity of vigilance in the workplace environment.

Balancing trust with appropriate skepticism is crucial to maintaining security. Trusting every employee without question can lead to complacency and a failure to uncover risky behaviors or intentions that could compromise organizational integrity. Organizations must remain alert and enforce policies that monitor and assess employee activities to actively mitigate insider threats.

In contrast, the other options highlight necessary precautions. Conducting background checks is a critical step toward ensuring that individuals in sensitive roles do not pose a risk. Reporting incidents, such as system damage, to law enforcement, signifies a proactive approach to managing any potential threats and involves appropriate security measures. Overall, the reliance on trust without a foundation of scrutiny undermines the very goal of security measures aimed at preventing insider threats.